
handle: 2262/98154
APPROVED The United Nations has initiated a paradigmatic shift in mental healthcare through the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), in addition to this the WHO has identified legislation as a key tool for improving healthcare. In 2016, India adopted the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act (RPWDA), closely followed in 2017 by the Mental Healthcare Act (MHCA). These Acts are pioneering pieces of legislation, both were explicitly written to bring Indian legislation in line with the CRPD. This research evaluated the concordance of India s Mental Health legislation with international standards and explored the views of psychiatrists in India. To examine this, a black letter analysis was conducted comparing the RPWDA and the MHCA with the CRPD and the World Health Organization s Checklist on Mental Health Legislation from the WHO Resource Book (WHO-RB). Thirteen focus groups were conducted and included 93 mental health professionals, in 4 Indian states, over a two-year period. This was done to compliment and inform the blackletter analysis. In depth thematic analysis was also carried out on data in relation to two key topics: electroconvulsive therapy and assisted decision making. Themes and sub-themes relating to these topics were identified and discussed. The black letter analysis highlighted a number of areas of non-concordance in the Indian legislation and identified the complexities of simultaneously protecting competing rights. Many potentially non-concordant areas stemmed from the interpretation of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities rather than the text of the CRPD itself. The focus groups revealed that the concerns of psychiatrists were often divergent or at odds with the international standards. They also highlighted that resource limitation and cultural differences will need to be overcome to adequately implement the new legislation. The complexity of using international standards and conventions as a mechanism for realising human rights for individuals with mental health problems was discussed.
Medical Ethics, WHO, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, Mental Health Legislation, 610, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, CRPD
Medical Ethics, WHO, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, Mental Health Legislation, 610, Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, CRPD
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
