
This study examines the comparative effectiveness of using law enforcement agencies for child protective investigation (CPI), in contrast with the traditional approach of CPI conducted by the public child welfare agency. The analysis uses 2006-2007 data from a natural experiment conducted in Florida to show modest differences in performance and cost-efficiency between the two approaches to CPI. These findings may have implications for other states considering outsourcing CPI to law enforcement.
Male, 340, 330, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Child Welfare, Infant, Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Law Enforcement, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Florida, Odds Ratio, Humans, Female, Child Abuse, Child, Program Evaluation
Male, 340, 330, Adolescent, Infant, Newborn, Child Welfare, Infant, Hispanic or Latino, Black or African American, Law Enforcement, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Florida, Odds Ratio, Humans, Female, Child Abuse, Child, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
