Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sydney eScholarshiparrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sydney eScholarship
Conference object . 2022
addClaim

The Economics of Total Mixed Ration Systems in Australia

Authors: Gargiulo, Juan Ignacio; Lyons, Nicolas; Carter, Sheena;

The Economics of Total Mixed Ration Systems in Australia

Abstract

An increasing proportion of dairy farmers in Australia are looking to transition from pasture-based systems (PB) to confinement, zero-grazing or Total Mixed Ration systems (TMR) in response to climatic pressures, market volatility or growth opportunities. However, there is little understanding of the economics of these systems under local conditions, and therefore, farmers have typically had to rely on information from overseas to support their decision-making. This study, conducted as part of the DairyUP Program (https://www.dairyup.com.au), aimed to compare the performance of commercial dairy farms operating TMR with those operating PB. Physical and economic data from TMR (n = 7) and PB farms (n = 58) were collected across different regions in New South Wales over five financial years (2016/2017 to 2020/2021) using the Dairy Farm Monitor Project methodology. The TMR farms operated a range of confinement systems (drylots, compost barns or freestalls) and were in different phases of the transition towards zero-grazing (all had transitioned the milking herd to zero-grazing by 2020/2021). Prices were adjusted by inflation and expressed in Australian dollars per kg of milk solids ($/kg MS). Differences between systems were analysed using linear mixed models with farm and year as random effects. Compared to PB farms, the TMR had larger herd sizes (564 vs 356 cows) and total usable area (604 vs 291 ha) and produced more milk per cow (608 vs 491 kg MS/cow). Despite gross farm income ($9.30/kg MS) and earnings before interest and tax ($1.22/kg MS) being similar between both systems, profitability, when measured as return on total assets, was greater for TMR (5.3% vs 2.4%). On average, variable costs, including feed, herd and shed, were similar between TMR and PB ($4.98/kg MS). Both TMR and PB farms had similar total overhead costs ($3.08/kg MS), including total labour costs, depreciation and repairs & maintenance. This research is the first in Australia to investigate the differences in performance between TMR and PB systems. Insights from this study can help improve planning and decision-making of dairy farmers considering or operating TMR systems.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities