Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Examining estimator bias and efficiency for pseudo panel data: A Monte Carlo simulation approach

Authors: Tsai, Chi-Hong; Leong, Waiyan; Mulley, Corinne; Clifton, Geoffrey;

Examining estimator bias and efficiency for pseudo panel data: A Monte Carlo simulation approach

Abstract

Pseudo panel data have been increasingly applied in empirical research as an alternative approach to a longitudinal analysis when genuine panel data are unavailable. However, conventional techniques are typically used to estimate pseudo panel data models without careful consideration to some unique properties of pseudo panel data. Ignoring properties such as time-varying cohort effects, a small number of constructed cohorts, large between-group variance, and trade-offs between cohort sizes and number of cohorts potentially lead to estimation bias or inefficiency not observed in genuine panel data. This paper presents a Monte Carlo experiment with scenarios that are designed to generate, under conditions of limited observations, various data possessing pseudo panel data characteristics, and evaluates the performances of various estimators using the simulation results. The main research findings are that the large between-group variation of the exogenous variable and the variance of fixed group effects in pseudo panel data are the primary causes of estimation bias and inefficiency. Other factors including the cohort size and potential non-spherical errors have a smaller impact on the estimators’ performances. An empirical application using Sydney Household Travel Survey data is also presented to illustrate the simulation findings.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

estimator bias and efficiency, Pseudo panel data; dynamic model; Monte Carlo simulation; estimator bias and efficiency, Pseudo panel data, dynamic model, 310, Monte Carlo simulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!