
The debate about adequate research methods for obtaining relevant results in clinical medicine and health care does not take place in a vacuum. In the present paper the longstanding debate about the epistemological underpinnings and methodological perspectives of qualitative and quantitative research methods in the social sciences is outlined and fructified for evidence-based medicine and health care. By using examples from research practice we will demonstrate that both the utilisation of qualitative methods and the use of a "mixed methods" design may contribute to the current methodological debate and improve research practice in evidence-based health care.
Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Research, Humans, Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Social Sciences, Delivery of Health Care
Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Research, Humans, Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Social Sciences, Delivery of Health Care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
