
handle: 2078.1/303670
Many task modeling notations, task analysis methods, and supporting tools have been introduced in human-computer interaction communities, often with different goals and strengths. With this comes need to understand their scopes and their differences. This paper extends previous work by conducting a survey on task models along with their supporting tools. The survey was carried out in three dimensions. Descriptive, meta-models were created for each evaluated approach as a common description. Comparative, a protocol is used to compare models. Generative, resulting from comparison a robust task model is proposed that considers most relevant aspects. This task model has been successfully applied in several real-life case studies. The goal of the present work is to emphasize potential task model’s usages, including: activity analysis, UI generation, evaluation of UI with respect to a task model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
