
Using a binocular, infrared charged coupled device (CCD), an eye tracker coupled with an Olivetti M24 PC (resolution up to 0.1 degrees, scanning with 80 frames/s), the eye movements of 20 normal individuals with normal visual acuity and binocular function were recorded to detect physiological endpoint (EPN) and rebound nystagmus (RN). Each subject was asked to fixate a target located in the primary position (PP) and after 5 s of recording time, to look at a target either 50 degrees to the right or left of the PP for approximately 20 s and then return for the last few seconds to the PP, EPN recordings were made with the room lights on and RN recordings were made both with the lights on and in total darkness. A forehead and chin rest with bite board were used. Twelve of the 20 subjects showed EPN and RN with the lights on. The 8 subjects that did not demonstrate EPN also showed no RN with the lights on. Recordings from all 20 subjects showed RN in darkness. No differences in amplitude were found between the abducted and adducted eyes. Although clear differences in the characteristics of gaze paretic or drug-related lateral gaze nystagmus and EPN have been found, no systematic differences in RN under lighted conditions had been observed between patients and normal subjects.
Adult, Male, Eye Movements, Nystagmus, Physiologic, Reference Values, Electronystagmography, Humans, Dark Adaptation, Female, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality
Adult, Male, Eye Movements, Nystagmus, Physiologic, Reference Values, Electronystagmography, Humans, Dark Adaptation, Female, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
