Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ MSpace at the Univer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Validating Critical Assumptions of the Control-value Theory of Emotion

Authors: Dryden, Robert Paul;

Validating Critical Assumptions of the Control-value Theory of Emotion

Abstract

Despite increased salience of achievement emotions in psychological theory and research, emotion research remains in a state of fragmentation (Pekrun, 2018). Pekrun’s (2006) control value theory of emotion (CVT) is an integrative framework for understanding the antecedents and consequences of achievement emotions. CVT incorporates perspectives from theories of perceived control (Perry, 1991), attribution theory (Weiner, 1985, 2018), achievement goal theory (Elliot et al., 2011), and theories of self-regulated learning (Fredrickson, 2001). This dissertation aimed to validate critical yet overlooked assumptions of CVT, with a focus on synthesizing disparate motivation constructs within a CVT framework. I conducted three separate but interconnected studies with this focus. Study 1 tested the interactive relationship between control and value appraisals predicting achievement emotions. Study 1 (N = 6541) extended prior research by incorporating principles of Weiner’s attribution theory to examine if students’ initial test performance in a novel competitive learning environment moderates Control × Value interaction effects on discrete emotions. Control and value interacted to predict nine discrete emotions. Students’ initial achievement outcomes moderated the interactive effects of appraisals on negative outcome-emotions (e.g., anger, shame), such that control and value were crucial for maintaining adaptive levels of emotions following academic setbacks (i.e., test failure). Study 2 (N = 3361) incorporated achievement goal theory with CVT by testing a central CVT assumption that appraisals of control and value mediate relationships between achievement goals and emotions. Mastery-approach goals predicted increased perceived academic control and value. Performance-approach goals predicted decreased value over two semesters. Cognitive appraisals were related to enjoyment, boredom, and anxiety which predicted achievement in the two-semester course. Study 3 (N = 1457) focused on CVT’s assumption of reciprocal causation. It extended prior research by incorporating theories of self-regulated learning to better align with CVT’s proposed model. Results demonstrated a reciprocal appraisal-emotion-learning-achievement temporal sequence across two semesters. This research strengthens understanding of achievement emotions, clarifies reciprocal motivational processes between cognition, emotion, and achievement, and aids in the development of interventions to foster adaptive achievement emotions. Further, this research advances efforts towards theory integration, an essential requirement for building cumulative scientific knowledge (Wigfield & Koenka, 2020).

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

Motivation, Competetive Learning Environments, Achievement Emotions, Control-value Theory, Achievement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green