Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Literature review on the validity of the Stepping Stones Triple P Program].

Authors: Paul, Probst;

[Literature review on the validity of the Stepping Stones Triple P Program].

Abstract

The preventive parent training program Stepping Stones Triple P (SSTP) (Sanders et al., 2004a), which was originally developed in Australia, is currently being examined in German-speaking countries. The object of this paper is to review the actual status of research on the validity of the SSTP program. Within this context, aspects of theoretical, internal and external (social) validity are examined. Based on two controlled-randomized primary studies on the effectiveness of SSTP, a secondary analysis was carried out in order to calculate effect sizes. The findings indicate (a) a positive internal validity, shown by replicated substantial and stable effects of the program onto child problem behavior as well as parental behavior; (b) a generally positive theoretical validity which has however certain restrictions regarding the shaping of the timeout component as well as the role of operant methods, and (c) a generally positive external validity which has however certain restrictions, in particular regarding the controversial social evaluation of the time-out component. From the results conclusions were drawn for a selective adaptation of the program as well as implementing SSTP as a preventive intervention method in families with children with developmental disabilities in German-language regions in the future.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adolescent, Developmental Disabilities, Reproducibility of Results, Child Behavior Disorders, Education, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Behavior Therapy, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Affective Symptoms, Child, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!