
handle: 1942/11771
In statistical practice, incomplete measurement sequences are the rule rather than the exception. Fortunately, in a large variety of settings, the stochastic mechanism governing the incompleteness can be ignored without hampering inferences about the measurement process. While ignorability only requires the relatively general missing at random assumption for likelihood and Bayesian inferences, this result cannot be invoked when non-likelihood methods are used. A direct consequence of this is that a popular non-likelihood-based method, such as generalized estimating equations, needs to be adapted towards a weighted version or doubly-robust version when a missing at random process operates. So far, no such modification has been devised for pseudo-likelihood based strategies. We propose a suite of corrections to the standard form of pseudo-likelihood to ensure its validity under missingness at random. Our corrections follow both single and double robustness ideas, and is relatively simple to apply. When missingness is in the form of dropout in longitudinal data or incomplete clusters, such a structure can be exploited toward further corrections. The proposed method is applied to data from a clinical trial in onychomycosis and a developmental toxicity study.
sponsorship: The authors gratefully acknowledge support from IAP research Network P6/03 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy). (IAP research Network of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy)|P6/03)
Double robustness, REPEATED OUTCOMES, Science & Technology, RATIO MODELS, missing completely at random, Double robustness; frequentist inference; generalized estimating equations; ignorability; inverse probability weighting; likelihood; missing at random; missing completely at random; pseudo-likelihood, BINARY DATA, 0199 Other Mathematical Sciences, Statistics & Probability, ignorability, likelihood, 0104 Statistics, generalized estimating equations, double robustness; frequentist inference; generalized estimating equations; ignorability; inverse probability weighting; likelihood; missing at random; missing completely at random; pseudo-likelihood, 4905 Statistics, REGRESSION-MODELS, missing at random, pseudo-likelihood, Physical Sciences, 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, frequentist inference, INFERENCE, Mathematics, inverse probability weighting
Double robustness, REPEATED OUTCOMES, Science & Technology, RATIO MODELS, missing completely at random, Double robustness; frequentist inference; generalized estimating equations; ignorability; inverse probability weighting; likelihood; missing at random; missing completely at random; pseudo-likelihood, BINARY DATA, 0199 Other Mathematical Sciences, Statistics & Probability, ignorability, likelihood, 0104 Statistics, generalized estimating equations, double robustness; frequentist inference; generalized estimating equations; ignorability; inverse probability weighting; likelihood; missing at random; missing completely at random; pseudo-likelihood, 4905 Statistics, REGRESSION-MODELS, missing at random, pseudo-likelihood, Physical Sciences, 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, frequentist inference, INFERENCE, Mathematics, inverse probability weighting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
