
handle: 1887/4291876
Northwest European Late Neolithic and Bronze Age societies are supposedly ruled by powerful elites who dominated critical resources and knowledge. The role of women in these societies and gender roles in general are hardly debated. I argue that this image of Late Neolithic and Bronze Age societies is distorted because the evidence for male elites is mainly based on burial evidence. In particular, from the moment onwards when weapons are presented as grave gifts to the ancestors, a neo-evolutionary interpretation of the grave goods strongly overrepresents men and their roles in society.Moreover, if one studies settlement remains from the periods in question, hardly any evidence can be foundfor these male elites. Rather, when critically analysing essential tasks in farming communities, it becomes clear that female tasks must have been just as important as male tasks. Therefore, I argue that we have to place agreater focus on settlement data and apply a more holistic approach to farming life in order to create a morebalanced and diverse view of gender roles in Late Neolithic and Bronze Age societies.
Settlement, gender roles, Farming life
Settlement, gender roles, Farming life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
