Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Regulation effects of various training modes on source-sink relation of cotton].

Authors: He-zhong, Dong; Yue-hua, Niu; Wei-jiang, Li; Wei, Tang; Zhen-huai, Li; Dong-mei, Zhang;

[Regulation effects of various training modes on source-sink relation of cotton].

Abstract

With the removal of vegetative branches plus the maintenance of early fruiting branches as the control, the effects of various training modes on the source-sink relation of field-grown cotton were examined in 2005 and 2006. The results showed that compared with the control, either the removal of vegetative branches plus the removal of early fruiting branches (I), the maintenance of vegetative branches plus the removal of early fruiting branches (II), or the maintenance of vegetative branches plus the maintenance of early fruiting branches (III) could increase the leaf area per plant significantly, with the average maximum LAI across the two years increased by 10.3%, 28.3%, and 9.5%, respectively, and resulting in the decreases of the load per leaf area and the ratio of sink to source. I and II alleviated the leaf senescence of cotton plants as indicated by the enhanced leaf chlorophyll content and the reduced percentage of yellow leaves and C/N ratio of functional leaves, and II also induced the late-maturing of cotton plants. III had no significant effects on senescence alleviation. I produced approximately equal seed cotton, but II and III produced 6.4%-15.6% less and 6.3% more seed cotton than the control, respectively. It was concluded that either the maintenance of vegetative branches or the removal of early fruiting branches could be an effective pathway to regulate the ratio of sink to source, C/N, and maturity performance of cotton plants.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Gossypium, Nitrogen, Agriculture, Biomass, Carbon

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!