Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Manuscripts of John of Damascus on Paul

Authors: Flood, David A.;

Manuscripts of John of Damascus on Paul

Abstract

This thesis sets out to determine whether the following three manuscripts constitute a newly identified textual family in Rom 13–1 Cor 4: Gregory-Aland (GA) 0150, GA 2110, and GA 1506. The term “family” refers to a homogeneous group for which a textual critic can confidently construct the archetypal text. The steps taken to prove a family relationship between the above witnesses include quantitative analysis, reading by reading analysis, and consideration of the scholia and marginalia. Others have suggested that the relationship of GA 0150 and GA 2110 is one of exemplar and of copy. Without any clear causal connections between the two manuscripts, however, a common exemplar best explains their remarkable similarity. Since the scholia of John of Damascus account for half the text on any given page, examination of these demonstrated that the special relationship shared by the lemmata extends to the scholia. The family is important because its archetypal text represents that which was available to John of Damascus. Therefore, the archetypal text of the family dates to the Umayyad Caliphate (mid-seventh to mid-eighth centuries) and comes from the Mar Saba monastery east of Jerusalem. Since the family represents the text available to—and transmitted by—a specific person, it should be referenced in critical editions as relating to John of Damascus rather than direct New Testament witnesses. There is also a component of digital humanities in this thesis since the study included the creation and utilization of a new desktop computer application and a web application.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

textual criticism, digital humanities, John of Damascus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!