Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Composition of mare's milk

Authors: Linton, Robert George;

Composition of mare's milk

Abstract

IV. The average percentage of ash in the milk of Continental mares is 0.38 and in the milk of British mares 0.51. It has been-found that in the lighter British breeds (Ponies and Thoroughbreds) the ash content is similar to that of the continental mares, whereas in the heavier breeds (Clydesdales and Shires) the percentage of ash is appreciably greater.

X. The percentage of lactose in mare's milk is fairly constant. When divergence from the normal occurs, a slight excess does not appear to be harmful. Foals do not thrive when the milk contains much less lactose than is normally present.

XIII. Two samples of "Witches Milk" (Hexenmilch) obtained from fillies born with fully functioning udders were analysed and in each case the milk was found to have practically the same composition as normal milk.

III. The average composition of the milk of British mares has been found to be in close agreement with that of Continental mares. The only marked difference is in the percentage of ash.

I. Samples of milk from one-hundred-andforty-two mares have been analysed for the purpose of determining the percentage of solids, protein, fat, lactose and ash.

VIII. Milk with a high percentage of fat is unsuitable for foals, and mares that secrete milk of this nature do not rear their foals satisfactorily.

II. Of this number, thirty-eight samples were taken during the period of colostrum secretion and one hundred and four were colostrum-free milks.

VI. Included in the samples examined were some from mares whose foals were not thriving; some of these milks were found to be abnormal.

V. With the exception of the mineral content, there are no marked differences between the milks of the various British breeds.

VII. The occurrence of oestrum in the mare commonly causes nutritional disturbance in the sucking foal.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2018 Block 20

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!