
Biodegradability of synthetic and real kitchen wastes was assessed in batch assays, under different solid contents between 1,8 and 24% and waste/inoculum ratios between 0,2 and 29 VSwaste/Vsseed sludge. Methanization rate and cumulative methane production from synthetic wastes simulated with different blends of protein, carbohydrates, fat and cellulose were compared. Although the excess of protein, carbohydrates and cellulose enhanced the biodegradability by 16 to 48%, the excess of fat reduced the maximum methane production rate and the biodegradability in 70 and 18%, respectively. The ratio waste/seed was found to be a critical parameter especially for solids content higher than 5%, since the biodegradability and the methane production rate increased significantly when the waste/seed ratio decreased from 1.35 to 0.2 g VS/gVS. The real kitchen waste was more biodegradable than the synthetic waste. However both produced methane at similar rates in batch assays for a waste/seed ratio of 1.35 gVS/gVS.
Anaerobic biodegradability, Kitchen waste, Waste/seed ratio
Anaerobic biodegradability, Kitchen waste, Waste/seed ratio
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
