Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Universidade do Minh...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Abordagens ao estudo em alunos de alto rendimento

Authors: Rosário, Pedro; Ferreira, Isabel; Guimarães, Carina;

Abordagens ao estudo em alunos de alto rendimento

Abstract

A literatura tem referenciado que os alunos academicamente mais competentes organizam de uma forma mais proficiente o seu trabalho apresentando abordagens profundas na sua aprendizagem (Biggs, 1993, 1996; Kember & Gow, 1994; Ramsden, 1997). Situando-nos num marco teórico organizador do discurso da sobredotação que inclua a motivação e a criatividade, a par da inteligência centraremos esta investigação na compreensão das abordagens à aprendizagem dos alunos academicamente mais competentes. A amostra tomada é de 866 alunos do 5° ao 9° ano do Ensino Básico, divididos em cinco grupos tendo com referência o seu desempenho académico. Os resultados revelaram uma associação estatisticamente significativa entre a competência académica e as motivações e estratégias superficiais e profundas. Coerentemente este impacto também se verifica face às abordagens superficiais e profundas exibidas por estes alunos. Os alunos mais competentes academicamente optam no seu trabalho por motivações e estratégias mais profundas que são as mais adequadas à realização dos seus objectivos. Esta coerência metacognitiva pode também justificar que os alunos de alto-rendimento não optem por motivações e estratégias superficiais para enfrentar o seu aprender. Este trabalho, na linha recorrentemente evidenciada na literatura, reforça a evidência de que conhecer o por que é que os alunos estudam e como o fazem realmente é determinante para o seu sucesso escolar.

The literature evidence that high achievers organise proficiently their academic work choosing deep approaches to learning (Biggs, 1993, 1996; Kember & Gow, 1994; Ramsden, 1997). Our sobredotation understanding is situated in a framework that includes motivation, creativity and intelligence. The purpose of this study focuses the learning processes of high-achievers. A total of 866 years 5° to 9° students of basic schools participated in this study. The sample is divided in five groups according the academic grades. The results revealed significant differences between surface and deep motives and strategies and the academic achievement. High-achievers use on their study more than the others students, deep approaches to learning which is coherent with the literature data. The results suggest the comprehension of the approaches to learning used in the classroom as an important tool to the significant learning and academic achievement increasing.

Country
Portugal
Related Organizations
Keywords

Conceptions of learning, High achievers, Competência académica, Abordagem à aprendizagem, Motivation of strategies, Motivação e estratégias, Approaches to learning, Alto-rendimento, Concepções de aprendizagem

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green