
The aim of the study was to determine which of the observed variables differentiate mostly the successful (Olympic Games contenders) from the less successful rowers (Internationally competitive rowers) and in order for that anthropometric and physiological profile of elite Croatian heavyweight rowers was assessed. Twenty nine national rowing champions were divided into two groups according to their international competitive achievements. Physiological characteristics were assessed during a continuous progressive rowing ergometer test. Differences were determined using the independent t-test with Bonferroni corrections. Successful rowers had somewhat larger values of almost all of the observed lengths, widths and girths (exceptions: chest and thigh girth). In addition, their maximal oxygen uptake was significantly higher (5.51 +/- 0.40 L/min vs. 5.16 +/- 0.39 L/min; p < 0.05) as was their power output at anaerobic threshold (346.3 +/-17.9 W vs. 319.2 +/- 20.1 W; p < 0.01). Less successful Croatian rowers should target their training in the upcoming years towards increasing, primarily, maximal oxygen uptake and power output at anaerobic threshold.
Adult, Male, rowing, Anaerobic Threshold, Ergometry, Athletic Performance, Biomechanical Phenomena, Respiratory Function Tests, Oxygen Consumption, physiology, rowing ; VO2max ; anaerobic threshold ; physiology, Body Constitution, Humans, Pulmonary Ventilation, VO2max, anaerobic threshold
Adult, Male, rowing, Anaerobic Threshold, Ergometry, Athletic Performance, Biomechanical Phenomena, Respiratory Function Tests, Oxygen Consumption, physiology, rowing ; VO2max ; anaerobic threshold ; physiology, Body Constitution, Humans, Pulmonary Ventilation, VO2max, anaerobic threshold
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
