
Athletic training educators often anecdotally suggest that athletic training students enhance their learning by teaching their peers. However, peer-assisted learning (PAL) has not been examined within athletic training education to provide evidence for PAL's current use or for its use as a pedagogic tool.To assess the effectiveness of intentional, formal PAL on the performance of psychomotor skills and to identify students' perceptions of PAL.Randomized, pretest-posttest experimental design.Athletic Training Research and Education Laboratory.Fifty-one undergraduate students (27 athletic training majors, 24 nonmajors).Review sessions led by either an Approved Clinical Instructor or peer tutor.We assessed pretest and posttest performance scores (number of correct skills) and the amount of time to complete the psychomotor skills in 3 categories of orthopaedic evaluation of the hand and wrist for subjects assigned to either a peer tutor or an Approved Clinical Instructor review group. Using the Athletic Training Peer-Assisted Learning Assessment Survey, we evaluated the perceptions of students assigned to the peer-tutor group regarding the benefits of, and preferences for, PAL.Differences in the pretest-posttest skill scores were noted in both groups (P < .05). No differences in the posttest skills scores or the times to perform the skills were seen between the groups. The Athletic Training Peer-Assisted Learning Assessment Survey revealed that most (n = 19, 70.4%) of the subjects felt less anxious when practicing psychomotor skills with peer tutors than with the laboratory instructor, and many students (n = 12, 44.4%) felt more self-confident when practicing psychomotor skills with a peer tutor.Peer-assisted learning appears to be a valid method for improving athletic training psychomotor skills. Peers can be resources for practicing clinical skills and report benefiting from the collaboration. Peer-assisted learning should be deliberately integrated into athletic training education programs to enhance student learning and collaboration.
Male, Adolescent, athletic training students, Interprofessional Relations, Sensitivity and Specificity, peer teaching, Peer Group, 796, Education, Professional, Reference Values, clinical instruction, Humans, Probability, peer education, Physical Education and Training, Problem-Based Learning, Orthopedics, athletic training education, Female, Clinical Competence, Psychomotor Performance, Sports
Male, Adolescent, athletic training students, Interprofessional Relations, Sensitivity and Specificity, peer teaching, Peer Group, 796, Education, Professional, Reference Values, clinical instruction, Humans, Probability, peer education, Physical Education and Training, Problem-Based Learning, Orthopedics, athletic training education, Female, Clinical Competence, Psychomotor Performance, Sports
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
