Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Differences in muscle fiber growth in slow-twitch muscles of the forelimb and hindlimb of the rat: role of the pituitary and food intake.

Authors: Arthur V, Everitt; Michelle G, Kofod; Vera, Terry; Christopher R, Murphy; Cedric D, Shorey; Geoffrey, Berry;

Differences in muscle fiber growth in slow-twitch muscles of the forelimb and hindlimb of the rat: role of the pituitary and food intake.

Abstract

This investigation tested the hypothesis that differences in the growth of fore- and hindlimb muscles in the rat are regulated by the pituitary and food intake. Using morphometric techniques, the growth of muscle fibers was compared in two slow-twitch muscles, the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) of the forelimb, and the soleus of the hindlimb, in male Wistar rats fed ad libitum, food restricted (FR) or hypophysectomized (hypox) from age 60 days. Growth was defined as an increase in fiber diameter and/or type 1 fiber percentage. The soleus had larger diameter fibers than the FCU in controls and FR, but not hypox rats. The growth in diameter, between 60 and 180 days, of both types 1 and 2 fibers in the soleus and type 2 fibers in the FCU was inhibited by hypox and, to a lesser extent, FR. Neither type 1 fiber diameter nor percentage of type 1 fibers in the FCU increased with age nor was it affected by hypox or FR. The percentage of type 1 fibers was higher in the soleus than the FCU and was further increased in the soleus of hypox rats. Food restriction produced a smaller rise than hypox in type 1 fiber percentage in the soleus. Thus, differences in fore- and hindlimb muscle fiber growth are modulated by pituitary hormones and, to a lesser extent, by food intake.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Models, Biological, Hindlimb, Rats, Eating, Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch, Pituitary Gland, Forelimb, Animals, Rats, Wistar, Muscle, Skeletal, Caloric Restriction, Hypophysectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!