Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Obstructed labor at a district hospital.

Authors: Asheber, Gaym;

Obstructed labor at a district hospital.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of all deliveries that occurred at Jimma hospital, south western Ethiopia from September 1990 to May 1999 was conducted to determine the incidence, maternal and perinatal outcome, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mothers with obstructed labor. Seven percent (945/13,425) of the deliveries were complicated with obstructed labor with an overall increasing trend noted during the study period. Sixty seven percent of the cases were primigravida and grand multiparous mothers. Fourteen percent of obstructed labor occurred among teenage pregnant mothers. Forty four percent of the cases had no antenatal care while 35.1% had antenatal care. Cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) was responsible for 80.6% of the cases, malpresentations accounting for the remainder, shoulder presentation being the commonest (11.5%). Fifty eight percent of the CPD cases were among the primigravida but para two to four mothers were not immune accounting for 25.7% of the cases, the rest being grand multipara, (15%). Fifty seven percent of the ruptured uterus cases were para two to four mothers while primigravids accounted for 7.2%. Maternal mortality was 9.1% while 62.1% of the perinates died with only 12.5% of the neonates having normal first minute apgar scores. Obstructed labor was the commonest cause of maternal and perinatal mortality at the hospital during the study period responsible for 45.5% and 37.4% of the deaths respectively. Any attempt to reduce maternal mortality at the hospital must comprehensively address the issue of obstructed labor, identify risk groups of mothers for this peripartum complication and design preventive strategies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Age Factors, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Dystocia, Parity, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Ethiopia, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!