
handle: 11588/751514
Statistical literature is being more and more concerned with debates about hypothesis testing and p-values supporting the significance of a given variable specification. Specifically, if on one hand statistical foundations about significance are not arguable, scholars should be able to distinguish between significance and variable importance. This is a matter of serious concern in questionnaire analysis to derive respondents’ profiles and develop targeted marketing strategies, for instance. To this aim, this contribution proposes a hypothesis system that considers the normalized dissimilarity measure to assess the importance of explanatory variables in the setting of mixture models for ordinal data to account for uncertainty of choice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
