Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

How far does pollinator behaviour -conditioned by floral rewards- determine geitonogamy rate?

Authors: ROSSI, MARTINA; FISOGNI, ALESSANDRO; CRISTOFOLINI, GIOVANNI; GALLONI, MARTA;

How far does pollinator behaviour -conditioned by floral rewards- determine geitonogamy rate?

Abstract

The quality and quantity of floral rewards, together with pattern of presentation, “drive” pollinator visits within and among plants. In multi-flowering species, besides floral traits and display, the degree of geitonogamous pollination is determined by intra-plant pollinator movements. We considered two case-studies, in order to analyze the role of pollinator behaviour in relation to plant sexual reproduction performance. In particular, we try to answer the following questions: how far does the incidence of pollinator behaviour on geitonogamy depend on the type of inflorescence? Does it have the same significance regardless of the degree of specialization of pollination system? Investigations were performed on natural populations of Dictamnus albus L. and Gentiana lutea L.. Phenology was studied during flower lifespan and inflorescence development. Visitors activity on flowers was monitored in the field, followed by pollen loads analysis, to evaluate the potential pollinators capacity. We investigated patterns of nectar production within the single flower and within the inflorescence; nectar quality (concentration and composition) was also considered. Results highlighted potential high inbreeding depression and different degree of self-compatibility in the studied species. Intra-flower selfing is prevented or strongly limited by dichogamy and herkogamy. Nevertheless, considering the pollination unit, Gentiana lutea’s “anthium” is represented by the single pseudo-whorl of flowers, where inter-floral self-pollination can in fact occur. Pollination is rather generalized in G. lutea, where visitors, belonging to several orders, behave in a “sedentary” or “dynamic” way to collect pollen and/or nectar. These behaviours are determined by insects’ intrinsic traits, but our observations suggest that nectar quality could also play a role. Depending on the frequency of “dynamic” vs “sedentary” pollinators, geitonogamy results to be more or less limited, and cross-pollination increased or not. However, the low levels of self-compatibility reduce the success of self-pollination. The relationship with pollinators is more specialized in the highly self-compatible Dictamnus albus. Major pollinators are represented by few bee species: their nectar-induced bottom-to-top movements along the raceme contribute to avoid geitonogamy and maximize pollen export, promoting outcrossing. Our findings show that the level of geitonogamy is strongly dependent on pollinator behaviour, although inflorescence structure and pollination system specialization contribute to determine the extent of this effect.

Country
Italy
Keywords

floral rewards; Plant-pollinator interaction; plant fitness; Pollinator behaviour

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!