Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Publications Open Re...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Natural stone: artificial ageing test versus natural weathering

Authors: BELLOPEDE, ROSSANA; Luodes, N. M.; MARINI, PAOLA; ZICHELLA, LORENA;

Natural stone: artificial ageing test versus natural weathering

Abstract

Natural stone has always been one of the main materials used in architecture for its singular beauty and durability. However, ornamental and structural stone elements might show decay essentially induced by climate factors such as atmospheric pollution, freezing–thaw action, thermal shock or acid rains. The deterioration of natural stone doesn’t concern only a worsening of its aesthetical properties, but mostly a decreasing in mechanical strength. To detect and to analyse the dominant destructive factors for stone durability is important to forecast the trend of the deterioration in the long term. For this reason, the comparison of the natural weathering with the results of artificially ageing tests on the same kind of stone is useful. This research compare the decay artificially induced in laboratory (according with the test method foreseen by European standard to evaluate the durability) with the one caused by natural ageing (with the action of the different climatic agents). In laboratory, six different kind of stone and in particular marble, sandstone, limestone, gneiss, granite and tephra, have been tested by means of two different artificial ageing tests: determination of resistance to ageing by means of thermal shock and freeze and thaw cycles. In order to assess the variation of mechanical resistance, flexural strength tests under concentrate load and ultrasonic test have been performed before and after the artificially ageing cycles. The tested stone gave different variations in mechanical strength for the two different artificial ageing test. This different behaviour have been explained by means the analysis of petrographic characteristics of the stone tested. Finally, a comparison of three case study of natural weathering of stones in historical building in different climatic zones of Europe have been made. For the evaluation of in situ decay, the study has been focused on marble, granite and gneiss, recognising their main weathering forms and comparing them with those obtained with the artificially ageing tests.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green