
handle: 11570/3287372
In this work, we study the accuracy and efficiency of hierarchical matrix (H-matrix) based fast methods for solving dense linear systems arising from the discretization of the 3D elastodynamic Green's tensors. It is well known in the literature that standard H-matrix based methods, although very efficient tools for asymptotically smooth kernels, are not optimal for oscillatory kernels. H2-matrix and directional approaches have been proposed to overcome this problem. However the implementation of such methods is much more involved than the standard H-matrix representation. The central questions we address are twofold. (i) What is the frequency-range in which the H-matrix format is an efficient representation for 3D elastodynamic problems? (ii) What can be expected of such an approach to model problems in mechanical engineering? We show that even though the method is not optimal (in the sense that more involved representations can lead to faster algorithms) an efficient solver can be easily developed. The capabilities of the method are illustrated on numerical examples using the Boundary Element Method.
Algorithmic complexity; Estimators; Fast BEMs; H-matrices; Low-rank approximations; Time-harmonic elastic waves
Algorithmic complexity; Estimators; Fast BEMs; H-matrices; Low-rank approximations; Time-harmonic elastic waves
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
