
handle: 11568/144562
Many evidences lead us to think that a significant portion of asteroids are aggregates of boulders kept together by gravity, with little or no contribution from cohesive forces. The standard hydrodynamics results for a self-gravitating and rotating cohesionless body would impose it to stay close to one of the well-known equilibrium sequences of MacLaurin and Jacobi; yet, when we compare the shapes of known asteroids, we find the bulk of the shapes far away from the classical equilibrium case. In this work an analysis of the preferential shapes that a gravitational aggregate tends to assume is presented. Our approach considers the evolution of a variety of initial shapes, free to evolve towards their own shape of equilibrium. The results show that actual asteroid shapes are consistent with the evolution, under the action of gravity alone, of aggregates of free components tending towards states of minimum free energy.
330, [PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], 510
330, [PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], [PHYS.ASTR] Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], 510
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
