
handle: 11562/433658
Nietzsche’s reception in the history of classical philology has been decisively influenced by the young Wilamowitz’s condemnation of The Birth of Tragedy, a condemnation which was automatically extended to all his philological writings. But the reproach made to Nietzsche concerning the betraying of the science is excessive and misleading. This study analyses the concept of classical philology that Nietzsche conceived during the years till the notes for the never published work We philologists. Nietzsche’s criticism toward the way in which that discipline was characterized in the 19th century (the so-called “historical method”, imperturbable analysis of the ancient sources, illusion of reaching objective results) presents a lot of interesting and convincing elements, while the construction of an alternative model of philology turns out to be weak and unrealistic.
Nietzsche; filologia; tragedia; Wilamowitz; Ritschl
Nietzsche; filologia; tragedia; Wilamowitz; Ritschl
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
