
handle: 11449/93864
Este trabalho foi conduzido no Laboratório de Peixes Ornamentais, do Centro de Aquicultura da UNESP (CAUNESP), Campus de Jaboticabal, SP e avaliaram dois tipos de alimentação para o peixe ornamental mato grosso Hyphessobrycon eques, (Steindachner, 1882). Foram utilizados o alimento inerte (ração) e o alimento vivo (zooplâncton) associados à biomassa de microalgas constituída por Chlorophyceae Ankistrodesmus gracilis (Reisch) Korsikov e Haematococcus pluvialis Flotow na forma liofilizada e cultura viva. Em relação aos resultados do primeiro capítulo referente ao alimento inerte, ocorreram diferenças significativas (p0,05) e ocorreram diferenças significativas (p>0,05) para o desempenho zootécnico. Os resultados obtidos permitem concluir que o mato grosso aceita dietas que contenham zooplâncton e microalgas, porém a associação de ambos promoveu maiores resultados de crescimento, sendo esta dieta eficaz como fonte de alimento
Current assay, performed in the Ornamental Fish Laboratory of the UNESP Aquiculture Centre (CAUNESP), Jaboticabal SP Brazil, evaluated two types of feed for the ornamental fish Hyphessobrycon eques, Steindachner, 1882 (popularly called mato grosso), with inert (meal) and live food (zooplankton) associated with lyophilized and live microalgae biomass Chlorophyceae Ankistrodesmus gracilis (Reisch) Korsikov and Haematococcus pluvialis Flotow. The first chapter related to inert feed. Significant differences (p0.05) and zootechnical performance results revealed significant differences (p<0.05). The ornamental fish H. eques accepts zooplankton and microalgae diets, but the association of both provided better growth results and shows a more efficient diet as feeding source
Pós-graduação em Aquicultura - FCAV
Aquarios, Zooplâncton, Fishes, Peixe ornamental
Aquarios, Zooplâncton, Fishes, Peixe ornamental
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
