
handle: 11449/228702
This study compared the population structure of Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis in two distinct periods in Fortaleza Bay, southeastern Brazil. Individuals were monthly sampled in November 1988-October 1989 (period 1) and in November 2008-October 2009 (period 2). In period 1, 80 juveniles were found (36 males and 44 females), whereas in period 2 were found 226 juveniles (62 males and 164 females). The individuals from period 2 were smaller (males: 17.0 ± 3.0 mm; females: 16.4 ± 3.3 mm) than those from period 1 (males: 22.1 ± 6.4 mm; females: 21.7 ± 6.3 mm). This reduction in body size throughout the study period might have been a consequence of an improper conservation management in the area up to 2008. In both sampling periods, the recruitment occurred in summer; however, in period 2, there was a higher abundance of juveniles in autumn too. This might be related to a higher precipitation caused by the El Niño South Oscillation (ENSO) in 2009. The increased precipitation might have prolonged the reproductive period and, consequently, the recruitment.
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Environmental protection area, Pink shrimp, Ubatuba, Fishing, Recruitment
Environmental protection area, Pink shrimp, Ubatuba, Fishing, Recruitment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
