
handle: 11441/30415
This paper aims at ringing the alarm in respect to some linguistic theorizing, stereotypical rather than prototypical examples often repeated in books of linguistics and linguistic behaviours which scandalize healthy readers and sane language speakers as soon as they meet these hocus pocus «scholarly opinions» in books of linguistics and which are now taken as God's truth.
El presente artículo trata de analizar algunas theorías en lingüística, además de ejemplos (frecuentamente citados en libros de lingüística), y que se basan en prejuicios, en vez de en verdades empíricas.
Le présent article traite quelques théories linguistiques, ainsi que des exemples (souvent cités dans les livres de linguistique) basés sur des préjugés, au lieu d'être basés sur des vérités empiriques.
pouvoir et solidarité, poder y solidaridad, sentimientos xenofobos, power and solidarity, xenophobic feelings, préjugés, sentiments xénophobes, prejudice, Prejuicios
pouvoir et solidarité, poder y solidaridad, sentimientos xenofobos, power and solidarity, xenophobic feelings, préjugés, sentiments xénophobes, prejudice, Prejuicios
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
