
handle: 11441/27890
Mi Objetivo En Este Trabajo Se Limita A Mostrar Cuál Es El Principal Rasgo Queleibniz Atribuía Al Mejor De Los Mundos Posibles. En Dicho Mundo Se Da La Mejorcombinación Posible De Pluralidad Y Unidad. El Concepto Del Que Se Sirve Leibnizpara Expresar Tal Síntesis De Abundancia En Los Resultados Y De Economía En Losmedios Es El De Serie. El Mejor De Los Mundos Está Recorrido, Sin Agotarlo, Poruna Infinidad De Series, Siendo Cada Una De Ellas Infinitamente Variada. Enninguna De Tales Series Afirma Leibniz Se Da Un Corte, Lo Que Propongo Que Seaentendido De Dos Maneras Complementarias: Primera, Entre Dos Casos De Una Seriehay Otro; Segunda, Todos Los Casos De Una Serie Son Intermedios. Con Ello Quieredecirse Que En El Mejor De Los Mundos Posibles No Hay Ni Un Máximo Ni Un Mínimo,O, Como Sostiene Leibniz, Siempre Se Puede Ascender Y Descender.
My Purpose In This Work Is To Show The Main Trait, According To Leibniz, Of Thebest Of The Possible Worlds. In It There Is The Best Combination Of Pluralityand Unity. The Concept Of Serie Is Used By Leibniz To Express That Synthesis Ofabondance Of Effects And Parsimony Of Means. The Best Of The Possible Worlds Isintersected Although Not Full Of Them By A Infinity Of Series, Each Of Themhaving Infinite Variations. Leibniz Says That There Is No Disruption In Theinner Of Every Serie, And I Sugest That His Sentence Has Two Complementarymeanings: First, Between Two Cases Of One Serie There Is Another Case; Second,Every Case Of One Serie Is In The Middle Of Others Cases. So, There Is Neithermaximum Nor Minimum In The Best Of The Possible Worlds, Or, As Is Thought Byleibniz, It Is Possible Always To Go Up And Down.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
