
handle: 11427/30622
Performance statistics are contrasted for seven CMPs: three options for the b control parameter crossed with two options for the cap on the TAC, and further a no cap option for the b+5% option. Despite a higher average catch, the no cap option seems undesirable because of poor lower 5%ile depletion and high AAV values. Instances of low 5%ile depletion values for M. capensis are shown to be linked to three likely less plausible OMs amongst the nine OMs that make up the Reference Set. However, in those cases, with the 2017 starting M. capensis spawning biomasses below BMSY, the CMPs would seem to secure a recovery towards BMSY.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
