Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YÖK Açık Bilim - CoH...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

İlköğretim 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin biyolojik zenginlik olarak bitkiler hakkındaki bilgileri

Authors: Avcı, Çiçek Eylem;

İlköğretim 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin biyolojik zenginlik olarak bitkiler hakkındaki bilgileri

Abstract

ÖZETBu çalışma, ilköğretim 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin bitkileri ?doğal zenginlik-biyolojik zenginlik? olarak öğrenip öğrenmediklerini sorgulamak amacı ile yapılmıştır.Çalışmada 4 ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bilgisi görüşme yöntemi ile, 6 - 8. sınıföğrencilerinin bilgisi ise bilgi testleri ile tespit edilmiştir. Görüşmelerde bilgi tespiti içinhazırlanan soru ve bilgi kayıtları formları ile 6 - 8. sınıf bilgi testleri, Milli EğitimBakanlığı İlköğretim 4 - 8. Sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji Ders Programı (2005) ve Fen BilgisiDers Programına (2000) göre hazırlanmıştır. Sorular programlarda işlenilen konulartemel alınarak sorulmuştur.Çalışma İstanbul'un iki ayrı ilçesinde 6 farklı okulda, toplam 1650 öğrenciyikapsamaktadır. Okullar, ilçelere göre farklı sosyoekonomik aile yapısındaki öğrencileresahiptir. Görüşmeler ve test sonuçları, öğrencilerin aile demografik bilgileri de gözönüne alınarak analiz edilmiştir.Sonuç olarak ilköğretim öğrencilerinin (4 - 8. sınıf) bitkileri ?ülkenin biyolojikzenginlikleri? olarak öğrenemedikleri, bilgilerini yaşamla birleştiremedikleri, bilgilerinkavramsal ve yapılanmacı olarak öğrenilmiş olmadığı bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar, dersprogramlarının ve öğretmenlerin öğretiminin yeterli olmadığını ortaya koymuştur.

ABSTRACTThis study has been done with the aim of to determine primary school, 4-8th levelstudent?s knowledge for plants as ?natural wealth-biological wealth?.The knowledge of 4th and 5th level students determined with interview methodand 6-8th level students with knowledge tests. Both the interview ?question andrecording forms? and knowledge tests were prepared according to Turkish EducationMinistry Curriculums (2000-2005) of ?Science and Technology? courses.The study was carried out at two districts of Istanbul and included 1650 studentsfrom 6 schools. In two districts, the students at the schools were the families withdifferent socio-economical levels. During analyses the results from interviews and tests,the demographic structure of families also considered.As results of the analyses, it has been found that primary school students (4-8thlevel) did not learned the plants as ?biological wealth of the Country?, they can notrelate their knowledge with real life, and their knowledge is not structured conceptually.These results also show that the curriculum and the teacher?s knowledge are notadequate for kind of training.

188

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Bitkiler, Eğitim ve Öğretim, Education and Training, Öğrenim ve Öğretim_Fen Bilgisi, Biology, Biyoloji

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green