Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Marmara University O...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Rekabet Hukuku açısından patent hakkı

Authors: Utku, Doruk;

Rekabet Hukuku açısından patent hakkı

Abstract

Having a systematical solution for the conflicts between competition law and intellectual and industrial property rights which tries to encourage innovation and invention activities by granting monopoly power to the creators is one of the most important problems of modern law systems today. A significant part of those conflicts are about patents which provides the widest and most effective monopoly power among the industrial property rights. The problems caused by patent protection in competition law can be seperated into two groups. In the first group there are the competition law matters originating from commercial strategies applied and patent infringement cases filed by patent owners. And in the second group there are the matters about patent license agreements. Our study has focused on the problems in the first group and patent license agreements ara generally kept out of the subject of the study. However, as some license agreement clauses are closely related to our subjects, we specifically referred to them in the related parts of the study. Our study consists of five main headings except the introduction and conclusion parts. Under the first heading, the relationship between intellectual and industrial property rights and competition law is generally and briefly reviewed. Under the second heading, we try to find out the anti-competitive effects of patent protection on the market according to the current patent legislation, following some explanations about the subject, scope and characteristics of the patent right. Under the third heading, the statutory boundaries of the patent right are reviewed in the competition law context and it is discussed how and to what extent they can be used to reduce the adverse effects of patent protection and to create a balance between patent and competition law. Under the fourth heading, assignments of patent rights which have anti-competitive and restrictive effects are reviewed. Under the fifth (and last) heading, we review the acts of patent owners which violate competition law and try to make clear the term 'patent misuse'. After that we explain the sanctions those can be applied to a patent owner who misused his patent.

Yaratıcılar lehine tanıdıkları tekel yetkileri ile yenilikleri ve buluşları teşvik etmeye çalışan fikri ve sınai haklarla, rekabet hukuku arasındaki çatışmaları sistematik bir çözüme kavuşturmak, günümüzde modern hukuk düzenlerinin en önemli problemlerinden birini teşkil etmektedir. Bu çatışmaların önemli bir kısmı fikri ve sınai haklar arasında en sert tekel yetkileri veren patent hakkı alanında yaşanmaktadır. Patent korumasının rekabet hukuku açısından ortaya çıkarttığı sorunlar iki grupta toplanabilir. İlk grupta patent sahibi tarafından, patent koruması altında uygulanan ticari stratejilerin ve onun tarafından açılan patent ihlali davalarının doğurduğu rekabet hukuku problemleri; ikinci grupta ise patent lisansı sözleşmelerinde yer alan hükümlerden kaynaklanan sorunlar bulunmaktadır. Çalışmamız ilk grupta yer alan sorunlar üzerinde odaklanmış, patent lisansı sözleşmeleri genel olarak çalışmanın konusu dışında tutulmuştur. Bununla birlikte, konuyu yakından ilgilendirdiği noktalarda belirli bazı patent lisansı sözleşmesi hükümlerine özel olarak değinilmiştir. Çalışma, giriş ve sonuç bölümleri haricinde beş ana başlıktan oluşmaktadır. İlk başlık altında genel olarak fikri-sınai haklar ve rekabet hukuku ilişkisi incelenmiştir. İkinci başlık altında patent hakkının konusu, kapsamı ve niteliği üzerinde durularak, mevcut mevzuat çerçevesinde patent korumasının piyasada yol açacağı rekabeti kısıtlayıcı etkiler belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Üçüncü başlık altında patent hakkının kanuni sınırları rekabet hukuku açısından incelenmiş ve bu sınırlamalardan patent-rekabet hukuku dengesini sağlamada ne şekilde ve ne ölçüde faydalanılabileceği tartışılmıştır. Dördüncü başlık altında patent devirlerinin yarattığı rekabeti kısıtlayıcı etkiler ve bunlara karşı başvurulabilecek hukuki yollar incelenmiştir. Beşinci başlık altında patent sahibinin rekabet hukukuna aykırı eylemleri incelenerek, patentin kötüye kullanılması kavramı açıklığa kavuşturulmaya çalışılmış ve patentin kötüye kullanılması durumunda uygulanabilecek müeyyideler incelenmiştir.

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Hukuk, Competition, Rekabet, Patent Hukuku Ve Mevzuatı, Patent right, Competence Law, Intellectual property rights, Law

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Fields of Science
Fields of Science