Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YÖK Açık Bilim - CoH...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Basketbol klasman hakemlerinin karar verme stilleri ve özgüven düzeylerinin incelenmesi

Authors: Yerebatan, Zübeyde;

Basketbol klasman hakemlerinin karar verme stilleri ve özgüven düzeylerinin incelenmesi

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective: The aim of this thesis is to examine of level of self confidence anddecision making styles of Basketbol referees in Turkey according to differentvariables, to guide these behaviors and to provide a source for the researches to bedone in this issue with the thesis results.Materials and Methods: In the first stage, the conceptual framework of the thesiswas put forward and the literature was searched for the thesis. In the second stage,survey technique was applied as data collection tool. In the study, `PersonalInformation and Opinion Form` and `Melbourne Decision Making Scale ` and `SelfConfidence Scale` developed for the referees of volunteers of 2017 visa of BasketbolFederation of Turkey were applied. In the third step, the data from the questionnaireswere analyzed in the SPSS program. In the fourth stage, the results of the analyzesare discussed.Findings: The frequency and percentages of Basketbol referees' opinions onpersonal information and decision making styles, self-confidence levels and thearithmetic mean of some variables have been determined. Hypothesis Test Summaryhas been uncovered, Tested by Student's t test and Anova test in variables thatprovide normality and homogeneous variance conditions. Mann-Whitney U andKruskal Wallis tests were used for the variables that did not enable normality andhomogeneous variance conditions.Conclusions: The making styles and self-confidence levels faced by Basketbolreferees in Turkey varies according to the personal information of the referees.Suggestions were presented in the direction of research results.Key Words: Sport, basketball, referee, decision-making, self-confidence

Amaç: Bu tez çalışmasının amacı, Türkiye'deki farklı klasmanlardaki basketbolhakemlerinin karar verme stilleri ve özgüven düzeylerinin farklı değişkenlere göreincelenmesi, bu konularda basketbol hakem eğitimine yön verilmesi ve tezsonuçlarıyla bu konuda daha sonra yapılacak araştırmalar için kaynakoluşturulmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Birinci aşamada, tezin kavramsal çerçevesi ortaya konmuş vetezin literatür taraması yapılmıştır. İkinci aşamada, veri toplama aracı olarak ankettekniği uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada Türkiye Baketbol Federasyonunun 2017 vizeliklasman hakemlerine gönüllülük esasına dayalı, hakemler için geliştirilen, `KişiselBilgi Formu`, `Karar Verme Ölçeği` ile `Özgüven Ölçeği` uygulanmıştır. Üçüncüaşamada, anket verileri SPSS programında analiz edilmiştir. Dördüncü aşamada iseanalizlerin sonuçları tartışılmıştır.Bulgular: Basketbol hakemlerinin kişisel bilgi, karar verme stilleri ve özgüvendüzeyleri ile ilgili görüşlerinin frekans yüzdeleri ve bazı değişkenlerin aritmetikortalamaları belirlenmiştir. Hipotez test özetleri, normallik ve homojen varyanskoşullarını sağlayan değişkenlerde Student t testi ve Anova testi ile; şartlarısağlamayan değişkenlerde ise Mann-Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis testleriyleyorumlandırılmıştır.Sonuçlar: Türkiye'deki basketbol klasman hakemlerinin karar verme stilleri veözgüven düzeyleri, hakemlerin kişisel bilgilerine göre değişiklikler göstermektedir.Araştırma sonuçları doğrultusunda öneriler sunulmuştur.Anahtar Sözcükler: Spor, basketbol, hakem, karar verme, özgüven

100

Country
Turkey
Related Organizations
Keywords

Basketbol, karar verme, hakem, Referees, referee, decision-making, Basketball, Decision making styles, Spor, self-confidence, Self confidence, Decision making, özgüven Sport, Sports

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green