Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Loreto: da santuario d’Europa a santuario d’EurHope e EurHome

Authors: Pongetti, Carlo;

Loreto: da santuario d’Europa a santuario d’EurHope e EurHome

Abstract

SUMMARY: Loreto: from a European sanctuary to a EurHope and EurHome sanctuary. The contribution proposes a reflection on the changing role of the Loreto sanctuary over time. It reconstructs the identity processes, the cultural and religious meanings which, from its origins and throughout the modern age, have characterized it as a garrison of Catholicism in the Euro-Mediterranean context, consequently associating it with specific forms of organization and territorial defense, to deliver it to the contemporary world as a pole of ecumenism and interreligious comparison. The architectural structure of a fortified sanctuary that distinguishes it attests to its role as a bulwark against the spread of Islam. The Counter-Reformation spreads Loreto devotion and multiplies the places of worship of the Holy House in the border areas against the spread of Protestantism. The opposing narratives delivered to us by the Grand Tour travelers add elements of critical examination of the religious factor in the territorial organization mediated by the sanctuary and the cult with which it is associated. Once the Unification of Italy was achieved, Loreto was at the center of relations between State and Church, and entered the direct administration of the Holy See. Today Loreto continues to be a destination for pilgrimages and religious tourism but, since 1995, it has acquired the new physiognomy of a EurHope and EurHome sanctuary, a place of interreligious dialogue, of a welcoming, supportive Europe of global peace.

RIASSUNTO: Il contributo propone una riflessione sul mutamento di ruolo del santuario lauretano nel tempo. Ricostruisce i processi identitari, i significati culturali e religiosi che, dalle origini e per tutta l'età moderna lo hanno connotato come presidio del cattolicesimo nel contesto euro-mediterraneo associandolo conseguentemente a specifiche forme di organizzazione e difesa territoriale, per consegnarlo alla contemporaneità quale polo dell'ecumenismo e del confronto interreligioso. La struttura architettonica di santuario fortificato che lo contraddistingue attesta il ruolo avuto di baluardo opposto al dilagare dell’Islam. La Controriforma diffonde la devozione lauretana e moltiplica i luoghi di culto della Santa Casa nelle aree di frontiera contro il dilagare del protestantesimo. Le narrazioni oppositive consegnateci dai viaggiatori del Grand Tour aggiungono elementi di disamina critica del fattore religioso nell'organizzazione territoriale mediata dal santuario e dal culto cui è associato. Realizzata l’Unità d’Italia, Loreto è al centro dei rapporti tra Stato e Chiesa, e entra nella diretta amministrazione della Santa Sede. Oggi Loreto continua a connotarsi quale meta di pellegrinaggi e di turismo religioso ma, dal 1995, acquista la fisionomia nuova di santuario d’EurHope e d’EurHome, luogo del dialogo interreligioso, di un'Europa accogliente, solidale, sostenitrice della pace globale.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Loreto, Grand Tour, dialogo interreligioso, turismo religioso

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green