
handle: 11368/2625835
This paper discusses the evolution of Ngen+N compounds (e.g. nan regnes dropa ‘no rain’s drop’) into N+N compounds (i.e. the equivalent of ‘no rain drop’) between the Old and the Middle English period. The contribution first describes various types of pre-nominal genitive constructions found in Old English, then illustrates the extension of genitive –es to all declensions and plurals in pre-nominal genitive constructions – where it was re-analysed as clitic or phrasal suffix-- and finally explains how the loss of genitive marking confined to Ngen+N compounds was prompted by the re-organization of the inflectional morphology, whereby, among other things, genitive –es was unselectively attached to all nominal roots.
ordered-level morphology, genitive marking, Old English, Middle English, genitive marking; Old English; Middle English; ordered-level morphology
ordered-level morphology, genitive marking, Old English, Middle English, genitive marking; Old English; Middle English; ordered-level morphology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
