
handle: 11368/2476729 , 11577/2420741
Composite likelihood functions are convenient surrogates for the ordinary likelihood, when the latter is too difficult or even impractical to compute, and they may be more robust to model misspecication. One drawback of composite likelihood methods is that the composite likelihood analogue of the likelihood ratio statistic does not have the standard 2 asymptotic distribution. Invoking the theory of unbiased estimating equations, this paper proposes and discusses the computation of the empirical likelihood function from the unbiased composite scores. Two Monte Carlo studies are performed in order to assess the nite-sample performance of the proposed empirical composite likelihood procedures.
Empirical likelihood; Estimating function; Likelihood methods; Pairwise likelihood; Pseudo-likelihood, empirical likelihood
Empirical likelihood; Estimating function; Likelihood methods; Pairwise likelihood; Pseudo-likelihood, empirical likelihood
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
