
handle: 11336/2648
In his article the author reviews Cajetan's different positions on the problem of the immortality of the human soul, and investigates possible reasons which led the Cardinal to dissent with the position of Thomas Aquinas. For this purpose, he Invokes selected interpretations of distinguished scholars, with special reference to the approach of Étienne Gilson. Against the background of his analyses the authors attempts to give a synthesis which, as he hopes, canbecome a modest contribution to contemporary comments on the thought of this great French medievalist about the problem of the immortality of the human soul in Cajetan.
Fil: Muñoz Medina, Ceferino Pablo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mendoza; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofia. Centro de Estudios Filosóficos Medievales; Argentina
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, SOUL, GILSON, IMMORTALITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, CAJETAN, THOMAS AQUINAS
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, SOUL, GILSON, IMMORTALITY, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, CAJETAN, THOMAS AQUINAS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
