Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Norwegian Open Resea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Brage NMBU
Master thesis . 2016
Data sources: Brage NMBU
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

China as a game changer in aid and diplomatic relations : a case of Norwegian aid and diplomatic relations in Africa

Authors: Asante, Michael Oduro;

China as a game changer in aid and diplomatic relations : a case of Norwegian aid and diplomatic relations in Africa

Abstract

China´s rapidly expanded aid, trade and investment in Africa since the turn of the millennium has attracted a lot of scholars’ attention. Some scholars have criticised China´s engagements as been driven by self-interest and argue that China´s growing presence in Africa will influence other donor countries to use aid and diplomatic relations to pursue self-interest. Norwegian aid and diplomatic relations in Africa have increasingly been linked with this debate by some researchers and diplomats from Norway. They argue that Norwegian aid and diplomatic relations in Africa has changed from been altruistic and that Norway is using its aid and diplomatic relations in Africa to pursue self-interest as a consequence of China´s growing presence in Africa. The objective of this research is to explore from realists´ perspective through the concept of interest that Norwegian aid has and always been motivated by interest. I argued that rather than moving from altruism to self-interests, Norwegian aid has shifted in character, and kinds of interests behind aid. Norwegian aid and diplomatic relations has shifted from diplomatic and security interests to economic interests as a consequence of growing Chinese engagements that has changed geopolitical scenario in aid and investment in Africa and the international system since 2000. Altruism has only been used to camouflage Norwegian self-interest. China´s growth in Africa has resulted in increased competition over African resources because of increased prices in natural resources especially in the oil sector, increased interests in investments and trade from foreign governments and entities. Africa now has strong consumer and purchasing power and has become more interested in trade and investment than aid. These changes in Africa as a consequence of China´s growth have influenced Norway to make policy changes and take initiatives in aid and diplomatic relations such as increased FDI, mixing aid with business interest, strategic cooperation with oil resourceful countries, changes in diplomatic missions in Africa etc. The official and rhetoric motive by Norway is based on moral and humanitarian but realists´ perspectives explain differently through the concepts interest. To the realists, Norway is using aid and diplomatic relations in Africa to pursue its economic interest in Africa.

M-IR

Country
Norway
Related Organizations
Keywords

VDP::Social science: 200

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities