Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Między zwolennikami anomeizmu a homejczykami - biskupie peregrynacje Eudoksjusza z Germanikei

Authors: Leszka, Małgorzata B.;

Między zwolennikami anomeizmu a homejczykami - biskupie peregrynacje Eudoksjusza z Germanikei

Abstract

Eudoxius of Germanicea's career should be placed during the reigns of at least several emperors starting from Constantine the Great. We are informed that during this over forty years period of active participation in the Church life, he was elected bishop of Germanicea, later Antioch and finally Constantinople. Both Eudoxius' long career as well as his personality defy an easy evaluation. On the one hand, he appears to have been a career-oriented man of no morale and thus able to pick his way between the two religious factions. On the other hand he was a man of the centre, avoiding extremism and happy to co-operate with all parties. He was condemned a number of times and subsequently deprived of his position. Many a time did he also break the Church law which spoke against transmission of bishops from one episcopal throne to another. However, thanks to Constantius' and Valens' favours, he rose to the position of one of the most influential counsels of the two emperors. Was he a genuine Anomaean (which is suggested on the basis of his activities in Germanicea and Antioch) or was he just a man incessantly searching for his own religious convictions? It is also certain that Eudoxius, as the bishop of Constantinople, stuck to the principle of similarity of the Father and the Son, so he supported the Homaeans. Was it just another manoeuvre of the skilful politician or a genuine adherence to the doctrine, however, is still to be decided.

Country
Poland
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!