
handle: 11056/24073
En el presente artículo se hace una descripción y critica del antropocentrismo especista. Teniendo como base este tipo de especismo las tesis kantianas y cartesianas respecto a las capacidades cognitivas de los animales no humanos. Por tanto, se intenta a partir de estudios relativos al cognitivismo animal mostrar que la base de este tipo de especismo es insostenible y por ende los humanos deben tener un mínimo de consideración moral hacia los animales no humanos.
This article relates to a critical description of anthropocentric speciesism considering Cartesian and Kant’s theoretical framework as a reference and foundation regarding the cognitive abilities of nonhuman animals. By considering previous research related to animal cognitivism, this study intends to show that speciesism is not defensible. Consequently, human beings should reconsider their moral perspective toward nonhuman animals.
Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica
Escuela de Filosofía
FILOSOFÍA, DISCRIMINACIÓN, ANIMALES, REASON, DISCRIMINATION, ÉTICA, ANIMALS, PHILOSOPHY, RAZÓN, ETHICS
FILOSOFÍA, DISCRIMINACIÓN, ANIMALES, REASON, DISCRIMINATION, ÉTICA, ANIMALS, PHILOSOPHY, RAZÓN, ETHICS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
