Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Manure Management

Authors: Backus, Ge B. C.;

Manure Management

Abstract

This working paper provides an overview and assessment of Dutch manure management policy instruments from 1984 to 2016. The most successful and cost effective measures have included restrictions on manure spreading, the creation of a national Manure Bank as an offtake of last resort, the requirement to inject manure into soil, support for flagship farms, and limits on farm size managed under the mineral input registration system. The various quota systems that have been implemented have proven costly for industry and the public sector alike, but have prevented livestock numbers and related pollution problems from increasing further. Ever stricter limits on the application of manure to soil, for example, have imposed costs but shown positive results. Applications of manure nitrogen decreased from 447 kg per ha in 1980 to 326 kg per ha in 2010, and applications of manure phosphate decreased from 160 kg per ha to 84 kg per ha over the same period. Dutch manure management policies have generally increased farmers’ incentives to seek valuable uses of manure. The costs of manure policy to the public sector have also been relatively high, with monitoring, enforcement, and registration averaging around 900 euro per farm per year. Part of the effectiveness of Dutch manure policy has been owed to its incrementalism. Restrictive measures have generally been designed to increase in stringency over time and allowed industry to adapt. Dutch manure policy has, however, cost the life of many of the country’s less-efficient farms. The number of pig farms in the Netherlands decreased from 34,000 in 1984 to 5,000 in 2015. Lessons learned include the effectiveness of gradually tightening standards, using combinations of sticks and carrots, and regularly evaluating policies. Promising approaches include the coupling of land and animals, and manure processing.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

MANURE, 330, LIVESTOCK, NUTRIENT ACCOUNTING, POLICY, 630, WASTE MANAGEMENT

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green