Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Public-Private Partnerships

Authors: Klein, Michael;

Public-Private Partnerships

Abstract

This paper provides perspectives on patterns of public-private partnerships in infrastructure across time and space. Public-private partnerships are a new term for old concepts. Much infrastructure started under private auspices. Then many governments nationalized the ventures. Governments often push infrastructure providers to keep prices low. In emerging markets, the price of water covers maybe 30 percent of costs on average, that of electricity some 80 percent of costs. This renders public infrastructure ventures dependent on subsidies. When governments run into fiscal troubles, they often look again for public-private partnerships, and price increases. As a result, public-private partnerships keep making a comeback in most countries, but are not always loved. Waves of interest in public-private partnerships sweep different countries at different times. Overall, in emerging markets today, public-private partnerships account for some 20 percent of infrastructure investments, with wide variations across countries and from year to year. There is no “killer” rationale for public-private partnerships. They can help raise financing when governments face borrowing constraints. They can be more efficient when sound incentives are applied. Existing evaluations suggest public-private partnerships tend to perform often a bit better than public provision. Yet, well-run governments can do as well. Public-private partnerships provide mechanisms to improve the governance of infrastructure ventures where governments are flawed. Once the fiscal troubles are over, the politics of pricing assert themselves again. Tight pricing erodes the profitability of public-private partnerships and the wheel of privatization and nationalization keeps turning, as it has since modern infrastructure services were invented.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

WATER PRICES, WATER PRIVATIZATION, CORPORATION, TAX, INFRASTRUCTURE, PRIVATIZATION” OF INFRASTRUCTURE, INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT, SHAREHOLDERS, RAILWAYS, ROAD, RAIL SERVICE, INFLATION, PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION, INVESTMENTS, PRIVATE VEHICLE, VEHICLE, PRIVATE PARTNER, PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, PRICE OF WATER, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT, EVASION, WATER COMPANIES, GOVERNMENTS, PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, INVESTORS, COMPANY, CONCESSION PERIOD, TRANSPORT SECTOR, WATER TREATMENT, ELECTRIC UTILITIES, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, SEWERAGE SYSTEMS, TOLL, ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, TRANSPARENCY, PARTNERS, SERVICE DELIVERY, 330, PRIVATE FIRM, COMPANIES, FIRMS, SUBSIDIES, PRIVATE FINANCIERS, MARKETS, PUBLIC SERVICES, FINANCE, SANITATION, STATE‐OWNED COMPANIES, INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE, PROPERTY RIGHTS, ROAD PROJECTS, PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, ENTERPRISES, TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE, INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE, PUBLIC ENTERPRISES, RAIL, GOVERNMENT FINANCING, PUBLIC SECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE, FISCAL DEFICITS, SERVICES, PRICING, PUBLIC SECTOR, PRIVATE CAPITAL, FOR‐PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, DEBT, PUBLIC‐PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS, WASTE MANAGEMENT, AIRPORTS, COST OF CAPITAL, COMPETITIVE MARKETS, WATER SECTOR, COSTS, WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, FEES, STATE ENTERPRISES, INDEPENDENT REGULATION, PRIVATE FIRMS, ELECTRICITY, PRIVATE‐PARTNERSHIPS, DEFICITS, ROUTE, QUALITY OF SERVICE, LENDERS, TOLL REVENUES, PUBLIC CONTRACTS, ROADS, ACCOUNTING, GOING PRIVATE, PARTIES, TOLL ROAD, CAPITAL MARKETS, POLICIES, DRIVING, HIGHWAY, AFFORDABILITY CONCERNS, SUPPLIERS, EQUITY CAPITAL, WATER SYSTEMS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, PRICE REGULATION, REGULATION, INSURANCE, BUILD‐OPERATE‐ TRANSFER, MUNICIPAL SERVICE, PRIVATE SECTOR, EQUITY, TOLLS, HIGHWAY ACT, INDEPENDENT” REGULATORY BODIES, SERVICE PROVISION, URBAN WATER, TOLL‐ROADS, PUBLIC SECTOR PROJECTS, UTILITIES, PUBLIC, MANAGEMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT, LABOR, PRIVATE FINANCE, URBAN WATER SUPPLY, PUBLIC OWNERSHIP, ROAD DEVELOPMENT, NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER SUPPLY, SUBSIDY, TRANSPORT, REVENUES, PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS, PORTS, PUBLIC INVESTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS, RAILROADS, PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP, PUBLIC ROAD, PUBLIC‐PRIVATE‐PARTNERSHIPS, TOLL ROADS, INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green