Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of evaporation duct height measurement methods and their impact on radar propagation estimates

Authors: Whalen, John David;

Comparison of evaporation duct height measurement methods and their impact on radar propagation estimates

Abstract

A study was performed to compare shipboard measurements of atmospheric parameters that impact the evaporation duct and its effect on the propagation of electromagnetic energy from the AEGIS AN/SPY-1 radars. Two ships, USS ANZIO and USS CAPE ST GEORGE, participated in the annual NATO exercise, BALTOPS, during the summer of 1997. They were equipped with an automated METOC sensor system, developed by Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, called SEAWASP. SEAWASP provided continuous measurement of parameters determining near surface refractivity and the evaporative duct throughout the cruise. SEAWASP data were compared with manual bridge observations in order to illustrate the difference in propagation conditions assessed by the two methods. Additionally, ERS-1 Scatterometer wind data were used in conjunction with SEAWASP data to determine the feasibility of incorporating satellite wind data in determining evaporative duct heights. The automated SEAWASP data was able to depict, with greater accuracy, the constantly changing duct height conditions whereas the bridge observations, made at hourly intervals, lacked temporal resolution, thereby missing much of the variation in duct height. The discrepancies in duct heights between the two measurement systems led to differing propagation ranges resulting in shorter reaction times to counter threats to the ship.

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

http://archive.org/details/comparisonofevap109458118

Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy

Keywords

Radar performance prediction, Environmental data, Radio physical optics, Engineer's refraction effects prediction system, Evaporation duct

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!