
handle: 10945/27745
This study employs Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery from the Marginal Ice Zone Experiment (MIZEX) 1987 to identify an optimal set of statistical descriptors that accurately classify three types of ice (first-year, multiyear, odden) and open water. Two groups of statistics, univariate and texture, are compared and contrasted with respect to their skill in classifying the ice types and open water. Individual statistical descriptors are subjected to principal component analysis and discriminant analysis. Principal component analysis was of little use in understanding features of each ice and open water group. Discriminant analysis was valuable in identifying which statistics held the most power. When combined, univariate and texture statistics classified the groups with 89.5% accuracy, univariate alone with 86.8% accuracy and texture alone with 75.4% accuracy. Range and inertia were the strongest univariate and texture discriminators with 74.6% and 50.8% accuracy, respectively. Despite the use of a non-calibrated SAR, univariate statistics were able to classify the images with greater accuracy than texture statistics.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
http://archive.org/details/seiceclassificat1094527745
Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy
Synthetic aperture radar., MIZEX '87 SAR Data, Sea ice, Univariate Statistics, Sea Ice Classification, Marginal Ice Zone, Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrices, Texture Statistics, Synthetic Aperture Radar
Synthetic aperture radar., MIZEX '87 SAR Data, Sea ice, Univariate Statistics, Sea Ice Classification, Marginal Ice Zone, Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrices, Texture Statistics, Synthetic Aperture Radar
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
