Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nutrient characterization of swine fecal waste and utilization of these nutrients by swine

Authors: Holland, Morris Randolph;

Nutrient characterization of swine fecal waste and utilization of these nutrients by swine

Abstract

Swine feces collected from finishing hogs was fed to 48 crossbred gilts averaging 125 kg in two total collection metabolism trials. Unprocessed feces (fresh) was used in one trial and dried feces was used in the other trial. Feces from the gilts fed the feces substituted rations were significantly higher in crude fiber, ether extract, crude protein, magnesium, copper, and zinc content in both the unprocessed and dry trials. The fecal concentration of ash, NFE, calcium, phosphorus, and potassium tended to remain constant, Phosphorus was the only urinary mineral which significantly increased as the level of feces substituted in the basal ration increased. Output of feces increased as the amount of feces substituted for the basal ration was increased with no differences in urinary output. Swine feces were found to be of less nutritive value than a basal corn-soybean meal ration, but nutrients were available. Digestion of dry matter, ash, crude fiber, ether extract, crude protein, and nitrogen-free extract was significantly reduced as either fresh or dried swine feces was substituted for the basal ration with digestion coefficients of (%): 52.3, 32.4, 50.5, 53.5, 62.7, and 48.5, respectively for the wet feces and 43.7, 30.7, 31.2, 54.7, 57.5, and 43.3, respectively for the dried feces, calculated by difference and regression, and averaged. The apparent absorption of most minerals analyzed was reduced as the level of feces substituted increased while the absorption and retention in grams per day was similar across treatments in most cases.

M.S.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

LD5655.V855 1975.H643

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!