Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Estimation of the proportions of grass and legume in extrusa of esophageallly-fistulated animals

Authors: Pigurina, Guillermo;

Estimation of the proportions of grass and legume in extrusa of esophageallly-fistulated animals

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to evaluate a method for estimating grass and legume fractions in extrusa samples from esophageally-fistulated animals, based on different concentrations of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), Ca and lignin in grasses and legumes. In experiment 1, NDF, Ca and lignin concentrations were measured in mixtures of six combinations of red clover-orchardgrass and alfalfa-tall fescue (100:0; 80:20; 60:40; 40:60; 20:80; 0:100). The R² values were .90, .80 and .22 for Ca, NDF and lignin, respectively. In experiment 2, fresh tall fescue and red clover were collected during 8 d, mixed in the same proportions as in experiment 1, and each fraction was fed to esophageally-fistulated steers. Extrusa samples were collected without loss of saliva. Regression equations developed were y= 1.08 - .008x (R²= .91) for Ca and y= 50.9 + .22x (R²= .74) for NDF, where x represents % grass. In experiment 3, two esophageally-fistulated steers were allowed to graze in 20 4 X 4 m² plots of red clover and tall fescue after fasting overnight. The grass/legume proportions of the extrusas and the grab samples were extrapolated from slopes. The botanical composition of grab samples differed (P<.001) from that of extrusas for both components and for both animals. Extrapolation from NDF values tended to overestimate the proportion of grass in extrusa samples and underestimate it in grab samples. Calcium was not affected by salivation and mastication and was more reliable than NDF. Lignin was not an accurate predictor.

M.S.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

Forage plants, LD5655.V855 1986.P5255, Forage, Feed utilization efficiency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!