
Since 1973, Revista Médica de Chile has classified biomedical and clinical prospective research papers in a Section named "Research Articles", while purely clinical and retrospective studies were classified into another Section, named "Clinical Experiences". This distinction seems no longer necessary, because both types of manuscripts are subjected to a uniform external peer-review system and their intrinsic quality is not a distinctive feature. Furthermore, the name of Sections where similar papers are classified by the major general clinical medicine journals is clearly non-uniform. Therefore, "Research Articles" and "Clinical Experiences" will from now on be included into a single Section: "Research Articles".
Research, Periodicals as Topic, Publication Bias
Research, Periodicals as Topic, Publication Bias
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
