Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

An investigation of differences and changes in L2 writing anxiety between blended and conventional english language learning context

Authors: Bailey, D; Crosthwaite, PR; Vorst, T; Lee, A;

An investigation of differences and changes in L2 writing anxiety between blended and conventional english language learning context

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of blended vs. conventional writing environments and L2 proficiency on cognitive, somatic, and behavioral components of L2 English writing anxiety. Second language anxiety was measured using Cheng’s (2004) Second Language Writing Anxiety Inventory (L2WAI) which measures cognitive, somatic, and behavioral components of L2 writing anxiety. Students were separated into a blended learning group that completed writing assignments through online forums and a conventional pen-and-paper group that completed writing assignments by hand. Students in both groups were required to write 150 words per task as well as provide feedback to two other students for each task. Students in the blended learning group provided feedback through the course learning management system while those in the conventional group provided feedback in class. Descriptive analysis of pre-L2WAI results found that both groups reported behavioral anxiety the most, followed by somatic, and then cognitive. Post-L2WAI results found that blended learning students reported increases in behavioral anxiety while conventional pen-and-paper ones had increases in somatic anxiety. No decreases in anxiety were observed. A positive linear relationship was found when comparing L2 writing anxiety and L2 proficiency. Findings provide support for pedagogical recommendations to mitigate L2 writing anxiety.

link_to_OA_fulltext

Countries
Australia, China (People's Republic of)
Related Organizations
Keywords

3310 Linguistics and Language, Computer aided language learning, Writing instruction, Blended learning, Writing anxiety, 1706 Computer Science Applications, Written feedback, 420, 1203 Language and Linguistics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!