Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Claim

The effectiveness of two types of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners' writing development: Direct WCF versus Coded WCF

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object 14 Oct 2016 China (People's Republic of) English
Authors: Li, Y; Han, Y;

handle: 10722/235225

The effectiveness of two types of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners' writing development: Direct WCF versus Coded WCF

Abstract

The quasi-experimental study investigated the differential effects of comprehensive direct written corrective feedback (WCF) and coded WCF on 88 Chinese lowintermediate EFL learners over 13 weeks. Coded WCF was found to be more effective in reducing error rates and narrowing the range of errors in student writing than direct WCF.

Roundtable Session 3: no. 423 - Reading, Writing, and Literacy (Paper)

Conference Theme: Applied Linguistics Applied

Country
China (People's Republic of)
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now